Rowing vs Running: Which Is Better for Cardio Fitness?

Rowing vs Running: Which Is Better for Cardio Fitness?

Rowing vs running: which is better for cardio? Both improve cardiovascular fitness, but the best choice depends on your goals. Running is ideal for building running-specific endurance, while rowing provides a low-impact, full-body workout that also develops muscular endurance.

If you're choosing between the two, consider calorie expenditure, joint comfort, muscle engagement and the type of exercise you can maintain consistently.

TL;DR: Running is better for running-specific endurance and weight-bearing exercise. Rowing offers full-body cardio with less impact on the joints. Both can improve aerobic fitness and support weight management when performed regularly.

Rowing vs Running: What's the Difference?

The main difference between rowing and running is how they engage the body. Rowing uses coordinated leg, core and upper-body movements, while running primarily challenges the lower body through repetitive weight-bearing movement.

Feature

Rowing

Running

Cardio fitness

Excellent

Excellent

Muscles worked

Legs, back, core and arms

Legs, glutes and core

Joint impact

Low impact

Higher impact

Calories burned

Depends on intensity

Depends on pace and intensity

Muscle endurance

Full-body emphasis

Lower-body emphasis

Equipment

Rowing machine

Treadmill or outdoor space

Best for

Low-impact, full-body cardio

Running endurance and weight-bearing fitness

Both are effective aerobic exercises. The better option depends on the training outcome you want.

Is Rowing or Running Better for Cardiovascular Fitness?

Both rowing and running improve cardiovascular endurance by increasing the demand on your heart and lungs.

For general cardio fitness, neither is automatically superior. Workout intensity, duration, progression and consistency have a greater influence on your results.

Rowing vs Running: Which Burns More Calories?

Running at a moderate-to-fast pace often burns more calories than moderate rowing over the same duration. However, vigorous rowing can also produce substantial calorie expenditure.

According to the 2024 Compendium of Physical Activities, estimated calories burned during 30 minutes for a person weighing 70 kg are:

Exercise

Calories in 30 Minutes

Moderate rowing (5.0 METs)

184 kcal

Vigorous rowing (7.3 METs)

268 kcal

Running at approximately 8 km/h (8.5 METs)

312 kcal

Running at approximately 9.7 km/h (9.3 METs)

342 kcal

Estimates use MET × 3.5 × 70 ÷ 200 × 30. Actual expenditure varies with body weight, effort and individual physiology.

These estimates compare specific activity intensities, not equivalent perceived effort.

For a useful comparison, focus on the pace or resistance you can sustain rather than assuming one exercise always burns more calories.

Is Rowing or Running Better for Weight Loss?

Both rowing and running can support weight loss by increasing energy expenditure. Neither specifically targets belly fat or guarantees faster results.

Running may be preferable if you enjoy jogging and can comfortably maintain longer sessions. Rowing can be an effective alternative if you prefer lower-impact exercise that also engages the upper body.

Ultimately, sustainable weight loss depends on overall energy balance, nutrition and consistent physical activity.

What Muscles Do Rowing and Running Work?

Rowing involves more direct upper-body engagement, while running primarily works the lower body.

  • Rowing: Engages the quadriceps, glutes, hamstrings, core, back and arms through a coordinated rowing stroke.

  • Running: Primarily works the quadriceps, hamstrings, glutes, calves and core stabilisers.

Rowing is useful for developing full-body muscular endurance, while running improves the muscles' ability to support repeated strides.

However, neither replaces dedicated strength training if building muscle is your main goal.

If you're looking to understand how resistance training supports muscle development, Orbit's guide to progressive overload explains how to increase training demands over time.

Is Rowing Better Than Running for Your Joints?

Rowing is generally lower impact than running because your feet remain supported and there are no repeated landing forces.

This makes rowing a useful option for people who want cardiovascular exercise with less impact through the lower limbs.

However, rowing still involves repeated knee, hip and trunk movement. Proper technique and appropriate resistance are important, particularly for people with existing discomfort.

Running places greater repetitive loads on the lower body, but this is not necessarily harmful. Gradual progression, appropriate footwear and recovery help manage training demands.

The takeaway: Rowing may be preferable when reducing impact is a priority, but the best exercise for an existing joint condition depends on individual circumstances.

Rowing Machine vs Treadmill: Which Should You Choose?

A rowing machine is better suited to low-impact, full-body cardio, while a treadmill is ideal for indoor walking, jogging and running-specific training.

Your Fitness Goal

Consider

Improve running performance

Treadmill

Full-body cardiovascular workout

Rowing machine

Lower-impact exercise

Rowing machine

Indoor walking and running

Treadmill

General aerobic fitness

Either

When choosing equipment, consider your available space, training experience and preferred workout style.

A rowing machine offers adjustable resistance and full-body movement. A treadmill provides controlled speed and, on selected models, incline settings for varied walking and running workouts.

For Australian homes, check operating dimensions, storage requirements and floor clearance before purchasing.

If you're working with limited room, Orbit's guide to the best cardio machines for small spaces can help you compare equipment options.

Can You Combine Rowing and Running for Better Cardio Fitness?

Yes. Combining rowing and running allows you to train cardiovascular endurance through different movement patterns.

For example, you might alternate running sessions with steady rowing workouts throughout the week. This can provide training variety while reducing the number of high-impact sessions.

The Australian Government's movement guidelines recommend moderate-to-vigorous physical activity for at least 30 minutes on most days, alongside regular muscle-strengthening activities.

If you're deciding how to balance easier aerobic sessions with more demanding workouts, Orbit's LISS vs HIIT guide explains the differences between low-intensity steady-state and high-intensity interval training.

Rowing vs Running: Which Is Right for You?

When comparing rowing vs running, neither exercise is universally better for cardiovascular fitness.

Choose running if your priority is improving running endurance or enjoying weight-bearing cardio. Choose rowing if you prefer a low-impact workout that involves both the upper and lower body.

Both can form part of a balanced fitness routine.

If you're considering indoor cardio equipment, explore Orbit Fitness's cardio range to find an option suited to your space and training goals.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is 30 Minutes of Rowing Better Than Running?

Both can provide effective cardio training. Running may burn more calories at certain speeds, while rowing offers greater upper-body engagement with lower impact.

Can Rowing Replace Running for Cardio?

Yes. Rowing can replace running for general aerobic fitness, although running-specific training remains important if you're preparing for a race.

Is Rowing Good for Beginners?

Yes. Beginners can start with short rowing sessions at comfortable resistance, focusing on technique before increasing workout intensity.

Does Rowing Build More Muscle Than Running?

Rowing involves more upper-body muscle activity and can develop muscular endurance. However, neither exercise is a substitute for progressive resistance training when muscle growth is the goal.

Back to blog

THE FITNESS
EDIT